Semantic robust parsing for noun extraction from natural language queries

This paper describes how robust parsing techniques can be fruitful applied for building a query generation module which is part of a pipelined NLP architecture aimed at process natural language queries in a restricted domain. We want to show that semantic robustness represents a key issue in those NLP systems where it is more likely to have partial and ill-formed utterances due to various factors (e.g. noisy environments, low quality of speech recognition modules, etc...) and where it is necessary to succeed, even if partially, in extracting some meaningful information

Towards Automatic Dialogue Understanding

In this paper we will present work carried out to scale up the system for text understanding called GETARUNS, and port it to be used in dialogue understanding. The current goal is that of extracting automatically argumentative information in order to build argumentative structure. The long term goal is using argumentative structure to produce automatic summarization of spoken dialogues. Very much like other deep linguistic processing systems (see Allen et al, 2007), our system is a generic text/dialogue understanding system that can be used in connection with an ontology – WordNet – and other similar repositories of commonsense knowledge. Word sense disambiguation takes place at the level of semantic interpretation and is represented in the Discourse Model. We will present the adjustments we made in order to cope with transcribed spoken dialogues like those produced in the ICSI Berkely project. The low level component is organized according to LFG theory; at this level, the system does pronominal binding, quantifier raising and temporal interpretation. The high level component is where the Discourse Model is created from the Logical Form. For longer sentences the system switches from the top-down to the bottom-up system. In case of failure it will back off to the partial system which produces a very lean and shallow semantics with no inference rules. In a final section, we present preliminary evaluation of the system on two tasks: the task of automatic argumentative labelling and another frequently addressed task: referential vs. non-referential pronominal detection. Results obtained fair much higher than those reported in similar experiments with machine learning approaches

SUMMARIZATION AND VISUALIZATION OF DIGITAL CONVERSATIONS

Digital conversations are all around us: recorded meetings, television debates, instant messaging, blogs, and discussion forums. With this work, we present some solutions for the condensation and distillation of content from digital conversation based on advanced language technology. At the core of this technology we have argumentative analysis, which allow us to produce high-quality text summaries and intuitive graphical visualizations of conversational content enabling easier and faster access to digital conversations

Deep Linguistic Processing with GETARUNS for Spoken Dialogue Understanding

In this paper we will present work carried out to scale up the system for text understanding called GETARUNS, and port it to be used in dialogue understanding. The current goal is that of extracting automatically argumentative information in order to build argumentative structure. The long term goal is using argumentative structure to produce automatic summarization of spoken dialogues. Very much like other deep linguistic processing systems, our system is a generic text/dialogue understanding system that can be used in connection with an ontology – WordNet - and other similar repositories of commonsense knowledge. We will present the adjustments we made in order to cope with transcribed spoken dialogues like those produced in the ICSI Berkeley project. In a final section we present preliminary evaluation of the system on two tasks: the task of automatic argumentative labeling and another frequently addressed task: referential vs. non-referential pronominal detection. Results obtained fair much higher than those reported in similar experiments with machine learning approaches

Query types in the meeting domain: assessing the role of argumentative structure in answering questions on meeting discussion records

We define a new task of question answering on meeting records and assess its difficulty in terms of types of information and retrieval techniques required. The importance of this task is revealed by the increasingly growing interest in the design of sophisticated interfaces for accessing meeting records such as meeting browsers. We ground our work on the empirical analysis of elicited user queries. We assess what is the type of information sought by the users and perform a user query classification along several semantic dimensions of the meeting content. We found that queries about argumentative processes and outcomes represent the majority among the elicited queries (about 60%). We also assess the difficulty in answering the queries and focus on the requirements of a prospective QA system to successfully deal with them. Our results suggest that standard Information Retrieval and Question Answering alone can only account for less than 20% of the queries and need to be completed with additional type of information and inference